Feast of St Mark

St Mark’s gospel was the first of the four to be written. Why do we think this? Because the whole of the gospel of Mark is reproduced in the gospel of Matthew and half of it in Luke. We know only a little about St Mark: that he was a companion of St Paul on one of the missionary journeys, and St Peter’s first Epistle tells us that he had Mark with him in Rome shortly before Peter’s crucifixion in Nero’s persecution in AD 65. St Mark seems to have spent a lot of time with St Peter and, in the very first chapter of his gospel, he records how Jesus healed St Peter’s mother-in-law of her fever. In AD 140, Bishop Papias of Hieropolis wrote: Mark became Peter’s interpreter and wrote accurately all that Peter remembered of the things said and done by the Lord.

Each of the four gospels has its own character and they are all so different: If St Luke’s gospel is a love story, St Matthew’s an intricate tapestry, St John’s a metaphysical poem, then St Mark’s is a telegram from the bridge of The Titanic one minute after the iceberg struck. That is, it is a gospel of crisis, of desperation with the sense of a spectacular ending.

Mark is something of a wild man and his language is the coarsest Greek in the New Testament. He is impetuous and relentless. His gospel is peppered with the word euthus which is translated straightway or immediately. St Mark’s gospel is a picture of restless, busy men, always on the go. His language is often violent as when he reports how Jesus cursed the barren fig tree and threw the money-changers out of the temple. He shows Jesus treating even his family and friends roughly. When the disciples tell him, behold thy mother and thy brethren seek thee. He answers, Who is my mother, or my brethren? And when Peter will not accept Christ’s prophecy that he will go up to Jerusalem and be crucified, Jesus addresses Peter as the devil: Get thee behind me Satan! Mark, the wild man, portrays Jesus as a wild man and says He is beside himself!

There is no Christmas story in St Mark’s gospel. No shepherds. No Kings. No inn. No manger. He begins his gospel with Jesus already a grown man. There are no resurrection stories either. No appearance of Jesus in the upper room, by the sea or on the walk to Emmaus. The last eight verses of the gospel – which do include a resurrection appearance – are a 2nd century addition by an editor who couldn’t put up with the starkness and bleakness of St Mark’s original ending. St Mark tells us of the crucifixion. But there are no comforting words from the Cross. In St Mark’s gospel Jesus does not say to the thief Today shalt thou be with me in paradise. He does not gently give his mother into the care of St John. He does not say, Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do. The only words from the mouth of the dying Jesus are words of dereliction: My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?  And then the scene at the tomb on Easter morning. The women do not see the risen Jesus. The scene is desolate, terrifying, panic-stricken:

And they went out quickly and fled from the sepulchre; for they trembled and were amazed; neither said they anything to any man; for they were afraid.

The theologian Denis Nineham gives us a good insight into the character of Jesus as portrayed by St Mark:

Anyone who reads this gospel straight through will recognise that it is as the Son of God rather than as a teacher or a prophet that St Mark presents Our Lord. Jesus comes before us as the mysterious Son of God – a numinous, rather awful figure whose work is to bring home to his generation the conviction that, by his ministry and his death, he will hasten the coming of the kingdom.

There are only thirty-four verses of parables in St Mark’s gospel – mainly the Parable of the Sower. And even this is included only to mock Jesus’s disciples for their lack of understanding: Know ye not this parable? And how then will ye know all parables?

The relentless allegro agitato of St Mark’s gospel is a vivid, breathtaking account of conflict: Jesus the exorcist and his conflict with the demons, with sickness, with stupidity, with obduracy, hardness of heart and with the corrupt religious authorities.

In the midst of all this haste and strife, there are some astonishingly personal and evocative touches. I said that St Mark was close to St Peter. Well, in his account of how all the disciples forsook him and fled, St Mark includes these mysterious words:

And there followed Jesus a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and the young men laid hold on him. And he left the linen cloth and fled from them, naked.

Why mention such a detail? The intriguing conjecture is that this is St Mark’s signature: that he was the young man in the linen cloth who fled naked on the night when Jesus was arrested.

Not many parables in this gospel, but plenty of prophecy. Jesus explicitly foretells the fall of Jerusalem – something which came to pass about twenty-seven years after the crucifixion. Looking out over the city, Jesus says:

Seest thou these great buildings? There shall not be left one stone upon another that shall not be thrown down. When ye shall see the abomination of desolation spoken of by Daniel the prophet standing where it ought not, then let them that be in Judea flee unto the mountains…

The abomination of desolation was the Roman standard. The Roman legions sacked Jerusalem in AD 70.

Plenty of prophecy. Prophecy in which Jesus out of his mouth reveals exactly who he is:

Again the High Priest asked him and said unto him, ‘Art thou the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?’ And Jesus said, ‘I am: and ye shall see the Son of Man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven…’

And then shall they see the Son of Man coming in the clouds with great power and glory. And then shall he send his angels and shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from the uttermost part of the earth to the uttermost part of heaven.

So in all the restlessness, disjunction and violent movement of St Mark’s gospel, who is Jesus meant to be? You know that gospel means good news. But what is the good news according to St Mark among all this fear and disturbance? The answer is that the good news is so amazing that even the disciples who live close to Jesus every day don’t understand it. The good news is so wild, incredible, original and unexpected that they don’t get it even when Jesus spells it out to them in words of one syllable:

And he began to teach them that the Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected of the elders and the chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again.

You couldn’t make it plainer than that, could you? St Mark is telling us that Jesus is the Suffering Servant of God prophesied in chapter 53 of the Book of the Prophet Isaiah:

He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief; and we hid, as it were, our faces from him; he was despised and we esteemed him not…he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.

For St Mark it is not the teaching of Christ which is at the centre of what he means. It is what he does in his life of absolute conflict. Even more, it is what Christ achieves by his death and demonstrates by his resurrection. I said at the start that the gospels are not biographies or novels. But, on reflection, we see that St Mark’s gospel has much in common with the modernist novel – in which the unknown. Mysterious and misunderstood stranger, whom no one understands, turns out to be the ambiguous tragic and triumphant hero who brings about our deliverance, our salvation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


6 Comments on Feast of St Mark

  1. The last eight or twelve verses are definitely not a second century addition unless you rely on the corrupt Alexandrian texts. In Greek, these last verses contain 175 words. There are 553 letters, 294 vowels and 259 consonants. The vocabulary consists of 98 words, 84 of which are found earlier in Mark and 14 found only here. 42 are used in the Lord’s address and 56 are not. Each of these numbers is an exact multiple of 7. That’s no coincidence.

  2. This magnificent and timely sermon deserves “wild, incredible, original and unexpected” applause.

    Is this going to be a regular SR feature? If so, I look forward to hearing about SS Philip and James on May 1st!

  3. A thoughtful piece – thank you. I recently watched Pasolini’s film The Gospel According to Matthew – I can recommend this to anyone interested in the New Testament.
    I’ve always wondered why the name Mark wasn’t very common in England compared to Matthew, Luke or John.

    • St Mark
      …as a side note, I follow your practice of not placing a full stop after “St”, unless I’m referring to a street name.

      Dr Adrian Fortesque (early 20th C.) used to get angry when people used unnecessary punctuation in reference to his parish church of St Hugh (not St. Hugh’s) in Letchworth. I don’t think he shot or killed anyone for doing so, although he had shot and killed a man some years earlier. Before being received into the One True Church, he was High Anglican, like you. I like my a first edition of his The Ceremonies of the Roman Rite Described, Burns & Oates Ltd. MCMXVIII