Why has the British government subcontracted its immigration services to the Mafia ?

Free housing, health, education and damages too

P&O Ferries and Brittany Ferries must be sweating over the success of the budget cross-Channel services being offered to customers looking to come over to Britain. I say ‘budget’, but one does not get much for one’s massive expenditure outlay: a rubber dingy that has not undergone any Health and Safety supervision and an old life-jacket. Nonetheless, the great advantages are that there is none of that messy paperwork incumbent on mainstream travellers – passports, insurance, tickets and the like – and one needn’t worry about the return journey (because it won’t happen).

Italy – and Lampedusa in particular – used to be the chosen destination of the migrants. Now Lampedusa is more of a central transport hub, facilitating an onward journey to the white cliffs of Dover. It’s like a slow version of connecting flights. In Britain, Home Secretary Priti Patel is now on Plan …er… is it V or W or X? to stop the massive influx of illegal immigration into Britain taking place on a daily basis. With her Rwanda option on hold due to a decision by the European Court of Human Rights (not a problem for our Antipodean counterparts in Australia with their much more effective system, which treats illegal immigration as crime, not as a hobby), is Britain the new Italy for seafaring immigrants? If so, we can expect to see a repeat of what has happened in Italy.

We all know that the malevolent people-trafficking gangs are too much of a challenge for the powers of the British state (heck, they even utilise the British Maritime and Coastguard Agency as part of the services they offer) but they are only going to get stronger and more organised. In Italy, the Mafia have their claws in the whole illegal immigration process, including the management of migrant reception centres. Hosting migrants occasions a €35 a day payment per migrant, which does not go to the immigrants themselves; much of it is pocketed by organised crime. The Guardian has reported on how the Mafia descend on these immigrant/asylum/refugee centres to recruit servile labourers, criminals, drug mules, sex workers and names for fraud. Many women migrants are sponsored by sex traffickers in the first place. It’s not a pretty picture, is it? The Guardian investigation notes: ‘One of the alleged bosses of the Mafia Capitale group in Rome, Salvatore Buzzi, was caught on a wiretap bragging about how much money he made off the backs of asylum seekers. “Do you have any idea how much I earn on immigrants?” he was heard telling an associate. “They’re more profitable than drugs.”’

The emergence of Matteo Salvini on the scene as the poster boy of the anti-immigration right (a very substantial constituency in Italy) offered hope that something would finally be done. When this leader of the League party entered government with his chosen brief as Minister of the Interior, he created quite a stir with his substantial influence on robust policies to stem the constant influx of illegal immigration. Salvini deliberately sought high-profile engagements with those helping to bring migrants into Italy. One such eye-catching event was the closing of ports. When in August 2018 Salvini announced that the coastguard ship Diciotti would not be given permission to dock to offload its 177 migrants, he actually faced criminal prosecution for kidnapping. But it was just another of his many media spectacles to raise his status as a robust right-winger. He advertised the kidnapping charge news on his Facebook page, receiving over a million hits.

The government’s hard-line attitude against illegal immigration worked as a deterrent – for as long as it lasted. But of course, it waned after it had served its temporary popularity-boosting purpose. The France24 news channel (as irreproachably woke as the most liberal media outlets) recently reported that in the first half of this year 34,000 illegal immigrants arrived in Italy by boat. This compares with 25,500 for the same period in 2020. (Apparently Covid restrictions provide the most effective border controls.) So illegal immigration by sea is back on the up again. As are the associated deaths: the president of the Sicily region has stated that ‘the Mediterranean is becoming the biggest cemetery of the desperate’.

The scepticism of Nigel Farage and many others that the British government will be in anyway effective against illegal immigration is likely to be proven repeatedly correct. If Italy, with policies that would be deemed extreme in the UK, has failed, then we are likely to see the same outcomes repeated here: the increase of both the involvement of organised crime and the volume of the illegal cross-Channel ferry service.

Subscribe to Digital magazine

Subscribe to Print Magazine

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

12 Comments on Why has the British government subcontracted its immigration services to the Mafia ?

  1. Organised crime relies on our feeble legal system, and the ECHR abetting the army of lawyers exploiting that . Until our Victor Orban steps in we are doomed. Boris utterly failed, concentrating on the ridiculous net zero plan instead of listening to the people. Will Liz Truss listen? You must be joking!

  2. The Mafia or its offshoots and equivalents have a considerable influence on and in governments, law enforcement and banks around the world.
    What will Liz do about it?
    Answer on a dud dollar bill.

  3. And yet, the illegal immigrants are the least of the problem.
    Ever generous with other people’s taxes the soon departing Mr Johnson has facilitated the current and future arrival of up to five million Hong Kong Chinese and two hundred thousand Ukrainians, amongst others: the regular ‘dependants’ from Pakistan, India, Nigeria and elsewhere.
    Arriving in the New Jerusalem, as nearly a million have in the last year, they expect and are entitled to free money, accommodation, healthcare and education. And of course food into this soon to be re-wilded if slightly peckish and chilly country.
    No matter that their skills are minimal, their taxi driving and social interaction, especially with white schoolgirls,is reknowned. In their gated estates our Mandarinate and politicians have already ensured that design powered generators will power their Teslas and lights in this and coming winters. The police and possibly the armed forces will, like those elsewhere in net zero anything Europe, will be tasked with contaiining the ‘exuberance’ anticipated by the Gang of Brussels from the new Europeans. That is, those who came to Europe to escape the very conditions they have been instrumental in creating here.
    Perhaps the newest import into Britain and Europe, replacing all those unwanted nitrogen fertilisers, will be phlegm from the chemical factories of the People’s Republic. It may help those New Europeans and Britons to adjust to the iniquitie, of plague, poverty, hunger, cold, thirst and war that our politicians have deemed us worthy of revisiting.

    • Once the nation of England in the United Kingdom was surreptitiously “redefined” as a “multicultural society” and “all races [regarded as] equal”, there were no grounds for immigration control, except for basically “economic” reasons. These were subverted by a spurious need for foreign labour and an ideology of guilt-ridden altruism, complicated by the worst of the Commonwealth and EU obligations combined. A few wise ones saw the dangers ahead, but were smothered gradually by an infiltrated television medium, education system, civil service and law enforcement, plus political violence on the streets. For a very brief analysis of cause and effect, see my annotated article “Britain in Deadly Danger” which the “racist and sexist” Euro-Canadian website alone agreed to publish.

    • The “racist” novels of Jean Raspail, Tito Perdue, Michel Houellebecq, Christopher Priest, Robert Heinlein, Charles Williams and Jack London coming true? Never heard of them – guess why? Whose fingers on the trigger (warning)?
      Climate migrants next? Asians and Africans moving north in droves?
      Despite general questions about the purpose, effects and expense of tax-funded foreign “aid”, I think that even in this time of accelerating economic crisis, the £1.5 million offered to help Pakistan monsoon victims insulting niggardly, when the pointless HS2 will cost £100 BILLION, helicopter carrier HMS Prince of Wales 3.1 billion, the annual asylum bill £1.5 billion, and even (yet another) “Holocaust Centre”, albeit in this case designed to remind Parliament next-door of our historic “genocide guilt”, £100 million.
      Quos Deus vult perdere….he sends Lizzy Truss into a Dizzy Fuss.

        • The RUSI expected Truss to spend an extra £157 BILLION on defence over 8 years. The questions are Why and What on?
          Taiwan, Syria, Iran, Ukraine…?
          I think the priorities are (1) protection of our shipping lanes, (2) allied work on cyber defence to cripple the command-and-control of dangerous nuclear powers, (3) defence of the UK and allied countries against terrorist, criminal and “economic” invaders.

          • Truss will “deliver” something, I wonder what? None of the above priorities I suspect.
            Sunak meanwhile is reported as planning to move in due course to America.
            The new Cabinet looks less promising than Dr Caligari’s….

      • It’s 75 years since Britain dissolved the Empire by leaving the Indian sub-continent. Have they ever sent us a penny since in recompense for destroying our shipping and textile industries, or compensation for the child pimps and rapists they exported?